Fresno Bee Newsroom Blog

Fresno council: Are city’s lobbying costs justified?

Fresno pays firms in Sacramento and Washington, D.C. for lobbying and governmental relations services, and has its own in-house employee as well. The annual tab exceeds $200,000.

Is it worth it?

Fresno City Council members want to know.

During today’s weekly council meeting, a contract renewal was up for Simon & Company, which lobbies on behalf of the city in Washington, D.C. The cost: $65,000 annually for two years, with the option of two additional one-year terms.

But then the questions started.

Given the city’s tight budget, belt-tightening and outsourcing, Council President Clint Olivier asked, is having a lobbyist in the nation’s capital really necessary?

He suggested putting a federal-level lobbyist on hold for three years, and then revisiting it.

City Manager Mark Scott seemed annoyed the possibility was even raised.

Cutting the lobbyist, he said, would be a disaster for Fresno. Budgets would have to be slashed, he said, because the city has become more reliant on federal grant money that Len Simon, of Simon & Co., routinely helps land.

“He is so good,” Scott said of Simon. “He knows the people he needs to know.”

Council Member Andreas Borgeas then weighed in. The deal is good, he agreed, but what are the city’s priorities? He also thought the two new incoming council members should have a chance to weigh in on that question.

His idea: Hold off three months until those priorities are established.

Then the Sacramento lobbyist — who is paid $95,000 annually — and local Governmental Affairs Manager Katie Stevens — who made more than $66,000 last year — came into the picture.

Again Scott was miffed.

“Katie is a 70-hour a week employee often times,” he said. “Yes, she is needed.”

In fact, Scott said, all three are needed.

“We’re lucky to have this team,” he said.

But Council Member Lee Brand felt a study was in order. Could another lobbying firm in Sacramento or Washington, D.C. do it cheaper or better? Does the city need lobbyists in the two capitals and in City Hall? Can all three positions be justified?

The questions, Brand said, must be asked.

“We’ve got to have a few tools left,” Scott responded. He said council members were starting to “nitpick” and he urged them to “go do your homework” to see if the city’s lobbying ranks were overstaffed.

In the end, at Brand’s urging, the council decided to extend Simon & Company’s contract six months — to June 30. Between now and then, a council workshop will be conducted to see whether that money and position, as well as the Sacramento lobbyist and Stevens’ position, are warranted.

Responses

Jim Otey says:

In a word, “NO.” But then just about nothing that Mayor Swearengin, her toadie Mark Scott, HIS toadie Bruce Rudd and the City Council spend money on is worth it. Why? Because of the lack of return. If you look at the amount of money this Mayor and her administration have shelled out, plus the amount of money the City Council has pulled out of thin air – it’s easy to see why Fresno is in such dire financial straits. The REAL reason that the City is in such trouble isn’t the poor economy – Fresno’s economy has been “poor” for at least a decade. The real reason is either financial ineptitude – or quite possibly financial malfeasance.

It’s BEYOND time for a recall vote on Mayor Swearengin. The fact that she ran unopposed speaks VOLUMES about how deeply the corruption of her administration runs. All the decent candidates who might have opposed her were afraid to run because of her “deep pockets.” And those pockets aren’t her own – they belong to wealthy real estate developers, business owners – and even people like Meg Whitman.

vintage1950 says:

I’m not always on the Mayor’s side and I’m critical of some of her spending ideas, especially on the various futile “downtown revitalization” efforts. However, although unfortunate, lobbying firms are a necessary tool to receive federal or state government funding for local projects. It seems silly that lobbying firms are paid to try to get funds back to local areas that many times sent that money in the form of taxes to the government only to have to “fight” and pay to try to get a fair share back. But that’s our system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>